“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

When You Refuse to Read, I Refuse to Respond.

 🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 9 February 2024

CALL A LAWYER. I’M BUSY RAISING CHILDREN.

Filed Under: Referral Repetition, Disability Disregard, Time Theft, Written Refusal, Motherhood Under Siege, RBKC Redundancy

📎 SUBJECT: Another Email About the Exact Same Incident

From: Samira Issa
To: A mother already harassed, insulted, and documented.
CC: Eric Wedge-Bull (chief archivist of outdated referrals)

Let’s review the only reply this email deserved:

“I am spending time with my kids. I do not want to waste my time with you. Call a lawyer.”

Read that again. Then frame it.

📚 CONTEXT RECAP:

  • Incident in question: 2 January 2024

  • Referral already addressed.

  • Medical conditions already explained.

  • Legal representation already engaged.

  • Communication boundaries already written.

And still:

“Would you be able to meet with me in person?”
“A verbal conversation will be beneficial…”

For whom, exactly?

Certainly not the asthmatic mother with documented PTSD and no obligation to reenact a safeguarding pantomime for your inbox.

🧠 THIS IS NOT SAFEGUARDING.

THIS IS EMAIL-BASED CONTROL.

A demand disguised as concern.
A loop disguised as support.
A system designed to monitor the mother, not protect the child.

⛔ NO IS A COMPLETE SENTENCE.

Nothing new has happened.
There is no safeguarding issue.
There is no court instruction.
There is no consent to speak.

There is only a mother with a calendar full of homeschooling, medical advocacy, and breathing.
Not begging.

Noelle Meline
Refusing participation in scripted concern since 2023.
📩 complaints@swankarchive.com

Labels: snobby, serious, written refusal, RBKC harassment, safeguarding theatre, mother not attending, Samira Issa, Eric Wedge-Bull, referral recycling, NHS-to-social-work pipeline, no consent given, court not consulted, sovereign parenting

No comments:

You Don’t Need a Conversation. You Need a Court Date.

 🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 9 February 2024

I Am Spending Time With My Children. You Are Spending Time Repeating Yourself.

Filed Under: Referral Looping, Asthma Disregard, NHS Collusion, Social Work Harassment, Verbal Coercion, Written Refusal Ignored (Again)

📎 SUBJECT: Referral (Still) About the 2 January 2024 Incident

From: Samira Issa
Also CC’d: Eric Wedge-Bull (Apparently Still Reading From the Same Script)
To: A mother who already replied. Firmly. Several times.

“Would you be able to meet with me in person?”
“A verbal conversation will be beneficial…”

You wrote this while claiming to have read all the emails.

So let’s highlight the most elegant reply yet:

“I am spending time with my kids. I do not want to waste my time with you. Call a lawyer.”

🧾 You were told:

  • The incident was already handled.

  • There is no new information.

  • The matter has been escalated to the court.

  • Medical documentation prohibits verbal contact.

  • Harassment litigation is in progress.

Yet you persist — not because of care, but because of habit.

🧠 THIS IS NOT A REFERRAL.

THIS IS A LOOP.

A loop of avoidance — designed to distract a disabled mother from her legal case, her medical care, and her actual children.

You are not checking safety.
You are checking control.

🫁 And again, because it seems printed words don’t register:

I cannot speak on the phone.
I will not attend in person.
I have legal representation.
All communication must be written.
The matter has already been addressed.

🎭 This Is Not Safeguarding.

This Is Bureaucratic Theatre.

And unfortunately for your department, you’re performing in front of a legal audience now.

Noelle Meline
Breathing, Litigating, Unbothered.
📩 complaints@swankarchive.com

Labels: snobby, SWANK tribunal, safeguarding harassment, legal escalation, verbal coercion refusal, RBKC misconduct, Samira Issa, Eric Wedge-Bull, NHS referral theatre, repeat loop abuse, written-only mandate, sovereign mother under siege

No comments:

Referral Theatre, Scene Four: The Return of Samira and Eric, Still Missing the Plot.

 🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 9 February 2024

YOU DON’T NEED CLARITY. YOU NEED A COURT ORDER.

Filed Under: Referral Looping, Disability Neglect, Legal Boundary Violation, Systemic Coercion, NHS-to-Social-Work Pipeline, Bureaucratic Farce

📎 SUBJECT: Yet Another Referral on the Same Incident

Perpetrators: Samira Issa & Eric Wedge-Bull
Incident in Question: Still 2 January 2024
Response: Still “No.”
Outcome: Still litigation-prepared.

“Would you be able to meet with me in person?”
— Samira, February 2024, pretending the last three refusals never happened.

Absolutely not.
Not now.
Not ever.
Not for déjà vu.

💬 Noelle's Responses, for the Record (Again):

  • “This is ridiculous.”

  • “This is the same issue I was referred to a month ago.”

  • “Nothing new has happened.”

  • “You need to contact the court.”

  • “Goodbye.”

🫁 For the Fourth Time:

I. HAVE. ASTHMA.

I. CANNOT. TALK. ON. THE. PHONE.

I. HAVE. A. SOLICITOR.

Your continued demands for verbal engagement are not concern — they are coercion.
This is not a service — it’s surveillance in a polite font.

🧠 The Pattern Is Now Clear:

  • Same incident

  • Same referral source (Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, retaliating again)

  • Same unlawful push for verbal engagement

  • Same refusal to accept written communication mandates

  • Same two social workers pretending the case is “new”

🚫 THIS IS NOT A NEW CASE.

✅ THIS IS A NEW LEGAL BREACH.

Every repeated referral based on the same data — without any new evidence — is a weaponised performance of process.

You are not acting to protect children.
You are acting to protect the referral pipeline.

🖋 Legal Position:

  • Medical negligence claim filed

  • Harassment and disability discrimination claim underway

  • Judicial review initiated to examine referral abuse and systemic collusion

No further communication will be tolerated unless directed by a judge.

Noelle Meline
Still Not Attending Your Office. Still Breathing Through Law.
📩 complaints@swankarchive.com

Labels: snobby, serious, safeguarding harassment, referral fraud, court-evading coercion, social work obsession, Eric Wedge-Bull, Samira Issa, NHS collusion, repeat referral abuse, asthma ignored, written-only enforcement, legal escalation

No comments:

If You Don’t Respect Written Communication, You Are Not Safeguarding. You’re Stalking.

 🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 9 February 2024

YOU’RE NOT “CHECKING IN”—YOU’RE LOOPING.
Also Titled: 

Filed Under: Repeat Referrals, Verbal Coercion, Disregard for Disability, RBKC Redundancy, Court-Evading Safeguarding, NHS Collusion

📎 SUBJECT: Referral from Chelsea & Westminster Hospital

Received by: Samira Issa & Eric Wedge-Bull
Rejected by: Common sense, basic chronology, and every previous reply

“I hope this email is received well.”
— Samira Issa, sending her fourth request for phone or in-person discussion on the same incident already addressed.

You hope it’s received well?

It won’t be.

It’s being received like this:
STOP.

🧾 Recap of Reality:

  • The “incident” occurred on 2 January 2024.

  • Referral already answered.

  • No new event. No new risk.

  • Court has been informed.

  • Mother has legal representation.

And still — here you are, again.

⚖️ The Legal Posture:

This is harassment.
This is institutional stalking.
This is retaliation for formal medical complaints.

Your department is not seeking clarity — you’re seeking control.

📞 What Samira asked:

“Would you be able to meet with me in person?”
“A verbal conversation would be beneficial…”

🫁 What the mother replied:

“I cannot breathe.”
“I have repeatedly stated that I cannot talk on the phone.”
“Nothing new has happened.”
“You need to contact the court.”
“Do not contact me again.”

And yet — you came back anyway.

✍️ Let Us Be Clear:

WE DO NOT DO “VERBAL CLARITY.”

We do recorded, time-stamped, documented refusal.

If you need information: Read the file.
If you need direction: Speak to the court.
If you need confirmation: Check the date.

❌ There is no unmet need.

❌ There is no safeguarding risk.

❌ There is no consent to verbal engagement.

But there is plenty of written evidence that you keep ignoring boundaries — even while claiming to “safeguard” them.

Noelle Meline
Already referred. Already replied. Already done.
📩 complaints@swankarchive.com

Labels: snobby, formal refusal, safeguarding harassment, verbal coercion, written-only mandate, social work stalking, NHS referral loop, Chelsea & Westminster collusion, RBKC incompetence, court avoidance tactics, asthmatic sovereignty

No comments:

Eric and Jess Came Over. They Saw Ballet Shoes and Boxes. They Wrote a Book About Trauma (And Invented a Urine Bin).


🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 12 July 2023
WE WERE NEVER ASSESSED. WE WERE OBSERVED AND JUDGED.
Also Titled: “Eric and Jess Came Over. They Saw Ballet Shoes and Boxes. They Wrote a Book About Trauma (And Invented a Urine Bin).”

Filed Under: Social Worker Surveillance, Narrative Fabrication, Health Disregard, Observation Bias, Fictional Evidence, RBKC Gaslighting, Legal Pre-Lit

🏷️ Subject: RBKC Initial Contact

Conducted by: Eric Wedge-Bull & Jessica Miller
Sanctioned by: Robert Young, Gatekeeper of the Imaginary

🧾 Allegation:

“We received a police report… cannabis… shouting… a bin filled with urine…”

🧻 Let’s pause here:

THERE WAS NO URINE BIN.

None.
Not present.
Not visible.
Not documented by anyone who attended the home.

But it made its way into the official record — because social work, in this case, prefers the literary genre of fictional hygiene horror over actual observation.

🎭 What Was Actually Observed:

  • A family preparing for a move

  • Boxes — naturally.

  • Children: articulate, engaged, joyful

  • No cannabis

  • No signs of neglect

  • No distress

  • No “urine bin”

  • Just a chronically ill mother doing her best while stalked by bureaucratic nonsense

👩‍👧‍👦 The Children:

  • Described their mum as loving, warm, supportive

  • Shared stories of ballet, gymnastics, coding, gardening, play

  • One child said: “Mummy does everything for us.”

  • Another said: “We hug her when she’s sad.”

No fear. No confusion. Just familial tenderness.
Which, of course, the system mistrusts.

📚 The Narrative Pivot:

“Three police referrals…”
“She gets angry…”
“There might be trauma…”
“She should probably get therapy…”
“And — again — there was allegedly a urine bin…”

Because when abuse can’t be found, the state will reach for metaphor.

🧠 Let Us Be Very Clear:

This was not an “assessment.”
It was speculative surveillance disguised as support.

And where truth didn’t cooperate, fiction filled the gaps.

🧾 Conclusion:

  • No cannabis use by the mother

  • No risk to the children

  • No urine bin — just a lie printed in a PDF

  • No distress — except the kind caused by being repeatedly watched, questioned, and gaslit by the very agencies assigned to “help”

Noelle Meline
Diagnosed. Documented. Defamed. Still standing.
📩 complaints@swankarchive.com

Labels: snobby, serious, SWANK tribunal, fictional evidence, made-up urine bin, Eric Wedge-Bull, Jessica Miller, RBKC misconduct, asthma ignored, trauma spectacle, home education bias, narrative distortion, legal escalation pending

No comments:

Documented Obsessions