Standards & Whinges Against Negligent Kingdoms (SWANK London Ltd.)

When National Redress Fails, We File With Geneva

⟡ “If the State Fails, the Archive Escalates.” ⟡
SWANK Submits Shadow Report to United Nations: Documenting Systemic UK Violations Against a Disabled Mother and Her Children

Filed: 31 May 2025
Reference: SWANK/UN/EMAIL-01
📎 Download PDF – 2025-05-31_SWANK_Email_UNRapporteurs_ShadowReport_DisabilitySafeguardingRetaliationUK.pdf
Summary: SWANK formally submits a shadow report to the UN outlining systemic disability discrimination, retaliatory safeguarding, medical neglect, and intersectional harm within the UK child protection system.

I. What Happened

On 31 May 2025, Polly Chromatic (Noelle Bonnee Annee Simlett) submitted a shadow report to three UN entities:
– Special Rapporteur on Disability
– Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women
– Urgent Action desk at OHCHR

The report alleges violations of:
– The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)
– The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)
– The Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC)

It details:
– Refused medical adjustments
– Procedural retaliation through child safeguarding channels
– Medical neglect by multiple NHS trusts
– Intersecting racism and ableism affecting both parent and children
– Institutional refusal to investigate or remedy

II. What the Complaint Establishes

• The UK has failed to provide medical access and procedural equity to a disabled parent
• Safeguarding structures are used as retaliatory levers — not protective frameworks
• Medical neglect is compounded by state narrative control and dismissal
• Oversight within the UK has failed — necessitating international attention
• SWANK functions as a public record and evidentiary vault in the absence of domestic protection

III. Why SWANK Logged It

Because this is no longer just a complaint — it’s a case study in human rights denial.
Because when the state silences, the archive speaks internationally.
Because escalation to the UN is not an end — it’s a signal: we documented everything.
Because this was not just a report — it was a declaration of jurisdictional failure.

SWANK logs the moment the domestic system failed — and the global one was summoned.

IV. SWANK’s Position

We do not accept that intersectional harm can be dismissed by internal process fatigue.
We do not accept that systemic failures can hide behind jurisdiction.
We do not accept that silence can survive documentation.

This wasn’t a report. This was an intervention.
And SWANK will publish every submission that says: the system saw, and still refused.

⟡ This Dispatch Has Been Formally Archived by SWANK London Ltd. ⟡

Every entry is timestamped.
Every sentence is jurisdictional.
Every structure is protected.

To mimic this format without licence is not homage. It is breach.
We do not permit imitation. We preserve it as evidence.

This is not a blog.
This is a legal-aesthetic instrument.
Filed with velvet contempt, preserved for future litigation.

Because evidence deserves elegance.
And retaliation deserves an archive.

© 2025 SWANK London Ltd. All formatting and structural rights reserved.
Use requires express permission or formal licence. Unlicensed mimicry will be cited — as panic, not authorship.

Social Work Isn’t a Safety Net. It’s a Mesh of Prejudice.

🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 10 October 2024

AN OVERVIEW FOR KIRSTY, WHO ENTERS LATE AND UNINFORMED

Filed Under: Medical Discrimination, Institutional Racism, Misuse of Police, Disabled Motherhood, Social Work Theatre, Kirsty Hornal's Entry

To: Kirsty Hornal, who enters this staged performance in Act III, Scene 7.
From: Polly Chromatic, who has lived every breathless line since Scene One.
Location: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2

You’re arriving ten months late.
Here’s your script: it’s been rewritten in oxygen levels, missing medical care, false accusations, and the enduring grace of a mother who was too breathless to walk—yet still managed to move house, homeschool four children, and survive systematic assault by the very services designed to protect.

🦠 WHAT HAPPENED:

Our home filled with sewer gas.
My oxygen levels dropped to 89%.
I was refused emergency treatment multiple times.
Nine officers were sent to our hotel over a false racial accusation after I was attacked.
I could barely walk for six months, but still managed to secure a new flat and move.
Social workers harassed me the entire time—never offering help.
I finally paid privately for the medical care I was denied.

🧱 WHAT THIS IS:

A public services vendetta dressed as “concern.”
A mother penalised for being visibly ill, but not fragile enough.
A disabled woman punished for not collapsing in the expected way.
A family bullied because the mother is white and the children are mixed, and the public doesn’t know how to metabolise that.

📎 WHAT I SAID TO KIRSTY:

“The British community commonly calls social workers on me anytime they are upset.”
“These complaints are the result of discrimination… because I don’t look unwell.”
“I’ve been an outstanding mother.”
“I’ve been harassed by the community through public services.”
“The way I’ve been treated is absolutely disgraceful.”

🗣️ COMMUNICATION NOTE:

I have a medically documented disability that makes verbal communication difficult.
Please do not call me.
All communication should be in writing—this is a reasonable adjustment under the Equality Act 2010.

✒️ FINAL WORDS FOR THE FILE:

Kirsty, I’ve copied everyone because I keep hoping someone, somewhere in this kingdom of paperwork and prejudice, might finally believe me.

Let this serve as your onboarding document.

Polly Chromatic
Breathing, barely. Documenting, always.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com

Labels: snobby, Kirsty Hornal, hospital discrimination, police misuse, racialised assumptions, disability misrecognition, sewer gas injury, public service abuse, mother’s overview, documentation over breath, no one helps, medical abandonment, systemic cruelty

No Harm Found. Still Under Surveillance.

🖋️ SWANK Dispatch | June 2024
THEY SAY IT’S A CONCERN. I CALL IT A PATTERN.

Filed Under: Professional Collusion, Mental Health Misuse, Home Education Disrespect, Coercive Bureaucracy, Care Plan Theatre, Resilience Pathologised

At every turn, they revise the narrative.
Not because new harm emerged—
but because no harm ever existed.

Thus the fictional threat transforms into a real weapon:
a fabricated mental health concern, wielded to undermine and outmaneuver a mother with no criminal record, no incidents, and no diagnosis—
only clarity, documentation, and unyielding resistance.

🌫️ THEIR VERSION OF CONCERN:

“Mother does not attend therapy.”
“Mother is resistant to professionals.”
“Mother has a tone.”
“Mother refused to consent to... [redacted — no consent was needed].”

Never once:

“Mother hits child.”
“Mother neglects medical care.”
“Mother failed to provide.”
“Mother’s children are distressed.”

Because none apply.

🗂️ REALITY ARCHIVED:

Children thriving in daily yoga, AI programming, acting auditions, and ethics seminars.
54 documents submitted.
Medical exemptions ignored.
Court records falsified and unacknowledged.
Requests for risk specificity dismissed with: “we’re worried you don’t understand.”

Translation:
“We cannot explain what we’re doing, but we’re doing it anyway.”

🛑 CALL IT WHAT IT IS:

Involuntary psychological profiling.
Systemic coercion masquerading as help.
Punishment for medical advocacy.
Mislabelled refusal as instability.
The only true instability is the institution’s grip on lawful practice.

🔒 FINAL ENTRY:

“Support is not support when you can’t leave.”
“Care is not care when it’s conditional on compliance.”
“Trust cannot be demanded by those who gaslight the truth.”

✒️ Polly Chromatic
Founder & Director, SWANK London Ltd
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
📧 director@swanklondon.com
🌐 www.swanklondon.com

Labels: snobby, false safeguarding, mental health weaponisation, home education dignity, SWANK surveillance resistance, sovereign parenting, professional misconduct, care plan abuse, unsupported support, court manipulation, pattern not protection

My Children Are Not Evidence in Your Untitled Crime Scene

🖋️ SWANK Black Paper | June 2024

We Do Not Consent to Babysitting by State Surveillance Officers
Dispatch from Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2 — By Polly Chromatic

Filed Under: Harassment by Conference, Home Education Discrimination, Medical Disregard, SW Misconduct

Let it be known across this mouldy kingdom that the Chromatic children remain impeccably mannered, scholastically advanced, and spiritually sovereign—despite repeated attempts by the State to provoke, gaslight, and diminish their mother.

I attended yet another Review Child Protection Conference, presided over by Gabby Bernard, who has now replaced the mysteriously departed Layla. A revolving door of chairs, as if the problem is in the upholstery rather than the script.

This gathering—like the one before and the one before that—was not a conference. It was theatre. Bad theatre. Low-budget, high-surveillance bureaucratic performance art in which every line is delivered in monotone:
"We're not saying there's a concern. But there has been a pattern of professionals being concerned..."

Translation: No actual evidence. Just a decade of murmurs and innuendo paraded as concern.

I, Polly Chromatic, formerly known in courtrooms and crisis meetings as “Noelle,” asked the same clarifying question I’ve asked since 2015:

What, exactly, is the risk of harm to my children?
And again, they could not answer—because there is none.

Instead, they offered a litany of non-events, including that I did not participate verbally in a previous meeting (due to severe asthma, as medically documented). Now, having spoken with “clarity” and “engagement,” the goalposts have moved again. I’m now too resistant, too fixed, too disagreeable.

This is the new authoritarian metric for “risk”: You do not believe your children are at risk.

In fact, I was scolded for not trusting the very professionals who have spent ten years constructing a case around shadows. My refusal to submit to coerced therapy, unspecified allegations, or unlawful surveillance is deemed mental illness by default.

🕯️ Meanwhile, the record reflects:

All four children are polite, healthy, bonded, and thriving in home education
GP Dr Reid confirmed regular care and follow-ups for asthma
Children’s extracurricular activities include kickboxing, yoga, AI coding, swimming, archery, and pottery
The Elective Home Education assessment deemed their programme appropriate and sufficient

And yet the plan continues. Why?

Because I am not broken. Because I write, speak, and document too well. Because I resist manipulation with evidence. Because I have no criminal record, no mental health diagnosis, and no visible subservience.

And so—like every good authoritarian regime—Westminster Children’s Services clings to the fiction of concern in the absence of wrongdoing. It is not care. It is containment.

They do not seek child safety. They seek mother silence.

And to that I say:
My voice is not your documentation. It is your cross-examination.

Conference Attendees of Note:

Gabby Bernard (Chair)
Edward Kendall (Social Worker)
Rachel Pullen (Manager)
Philip Reid (GP)
Janet West-Jones (Police)
Gideon Mpalanyi (Home Education)
Laura Jennings (Solicitor)

🗓️ Next Core Group: 16 July 2024
🗓️ Next Conference: 20 November 2024
📍Venue: 215 Lisson Grove NW8

📮 Filed from Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
✒️ By: Polly Chromatic

Labels: Home Education, Harassment by Social Services, Misuse of Mental Health Allegations, Chronic Illness Discrimination, Child Protection Overreach, No Risk Identified, Evidence Refused, Medical Sovereignty

They Say They Want to Understand. What They Want is Compliance.

🕯️ SWANK Dispatch | 5 June 2024

A Conference of Delusion: When Welfare is Code for Surveillance

labels: Review Conference, Social Work Theatre, Surveillance Dressed as Support, CP Plan Retaliation, Typological Control, Harassment as Process, Not Safe But Watched, Author: Polly Chromatic

Despite being “pleased to meet me (albeit virtually)”, the new conference chair arrived not to understand, but to explain. I was offered support so that the relationship can feel less threatening, but no one reflected on why it is in fact threatening.

Let us be immaculately clear:

💨 I was unable to breathe due to asthma.
📜 I have submitted 54 documents.
📵 I am verbally limited due to a physical condition.
🧠 I have completed multiple mental health assessments.
🎓 I homeschool four children with a thriving educational programme.
👁️ I work full time and conduct ethical behavioural research.
🗂️ They’ve admitted they can’t open Google Drive.

And yet—

They say they “don’t understand our lived experience.”
They say they “worry about [my] mental health.”
They say they “want a chronology.”
They say “the support is there.”
They say.

Meanwhile, they ignore my children's voices. They ignore every record that doesn't fit their frame. They rely on outdated innuendo, social worker gossip, and weaponised referrals from strangers who neither know us nor belong in the conversation.

Not a single safeguarding risk has ever been substantiated.

What is happening here is not protection.
It is pattern recognition avoidance.
It is history rewritten through “professional concern.”
It is what happens when a woman does not flinch.

Selected Farce Highlights:

They acknowledge repeated bullying, repeated allegations, no actual harm.
They cite “concerns” as justification for surveillance, scrutiny, and therapy mandates.
They pathologise dissent as mental instability.
They suggest I record less, while refusing to tell me the risk.
They reduce documented disability to mere “mistrust.”
They recommend “engagement,” but block access to my own files.

A Reminder from the Archive:

The term “support” is being used incorrectly.

Support is not mandatory therapy for fabricated problems.
Support is not forced documentation with no feedback loop.
Support is not referral theatre when you’ve already submitted everything.
Support is not babysitting social workers who do not understand your life.

What I Said:

“British people like to blame others so they don’t get into trouble.”
“I don’t have time to write a book for Social Services.”
“Everyone knows social workers are evil.”
“I practice yoga every morning.”
“My mental health has an amazing impact on the children.”

And finally—

“These meetings are a waste of time. Reciprocity is key.”

Filed under:
📁 Institutional Gaslighting, Bureaucratic Surveillance, Narrative Management, Mental Health as Social Control, Neurodivergent Motherhood, CP Plan Abuse, Misogynist Welfare System, Weaponised Assessment

© Polly Chromatic, Flat 22 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🦚 Standards & Whinges Against Negligent Kingdoms | www.swankarchive.com