🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 12 July 2023
THERE WAS NO URINE BIN. BUT THANK YOU FOR REPEATING THE LIE 17 PAGES LATER.
Filed Under: RBKC Staged Concern, Poorly Written Assessments, Police Paranoia, Unwashed Truths, False Assumptions, Legal Closure with Side-Eye
📎 SUBJECT: Let’s Talk About The Bin You Didn’t See
To: RBKC Children’s Services
CC’d: Complaints, Legal, Ombudsman Shadowfile, NHS Shadowfile, Public Integrity Trust
From: Noelle Bonneannée
“The police observed a waste paper bin filled with urine in the property.”
Really?
Because Eric and Jess didn’t.
Because the report confirms the property was clean.
Because there’s no photo.
Because there’s no urine.
Because you wanted there to be.
🕯 WHEN YOU WANT TO BELIEVE A BIN IS A TOILET:
Noelle explained the context: “if the bathroom is in use”, she might use a lined container and empty it.
That is not neglect. That is bodily autonomy and basic logic.
It was not present during the visit.
There was no smell, no hygiene issue, no photographic evidence.
Yet it made the report. Twice.
🧾 FULL CONTEXT IGNORED:
Family was in the middle of a move.
Children were cheerful, healthy, articulate, bonded.
Gymnastics, ballet, tablet learning, calculus (!).
A black eye was explained and investigated with no action taken.
The cannabis joint was not Noelle’s.
Noelle has asthma, not anger management issues.
🗣 THINGS THE CHILDREN SAID:
“She does everything for us.”
“She helps us calm down.”
“We play, we learn, we love each other.”
“She might shout, but we talk about it after.”
“She says sorry.”
“We’re safe.”
“We want to stay.”
That’s not neglect.
That’s regulation.
That’s attachment.
That’s parenting.
🧘🏽♀️ Noelle’s Admissions (with Context):
She has severe asthma and panic attacks.
She’s been hospitalised and ignored.
She doesn’t smoke.
Her partner smokes outside.
She argues with her mother, not her children.
She needs help changing surnames, not surveillance.
🔍 RBKC’S FINAL POSITION:
“The concerns the police raised were not evident during our visits... the children appeared to be happy and cared for.”
“We are not of the opinion that a further assessment is necessary at the current time.”
Case closed.
So what was this for?
Answer: Pattern-building.
You weren’t observing. You were collecting.
For what?
We’ll see you in court.
Noelle Meline
There was no urine bin. But there will be a judicial review.
📩 complaints@swankarchive.com
Labels: snobby, false assumptions, safeguarding theatre, police fabrication, Eric Wedge-Bull, Jessica Miller, RBKC misconduct, no urine bin, asthma discrimination, school sabotage, cannabis scapegoating, parental competence, judicial review pending