“Though the Witch knew the Deep Magic, there is a magic deeper still which she did not know. Her knowledge goes back only to the dawn of time. But if she could have looked a little further back… she would have known that when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor’s stead, the Table would crack and Death itself would start working backward.” - Aslan, C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

Documented Obsessions

When Silence Is the Only Accommodation You Won’t Offer.


🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024
I’M NOT AVOIDING THERAPY. YOU’RE AVOIDING ACCESS.
Also Titled: “When Silence Is the Only Accommodation You Won’t Offer.”

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic, Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Filed Under: Therapy Denial · Institutional Inaccessibility · Verbal Disability · Community Exclusion · Communication Barriers · Mental Health Discrimination · SWANK Correctional Filing

To: Kirsty Hornal
Cc: Dr Philip Reid, Gideon Mpalanyi, Laura Savage, Simon O'Meara
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson, Curator of Access Denied

💬 THE MESSAGE YOU RECEIVED—AND STILL FAILED TO DECODE:

“I’d love to go to therapy but no one will provide adjustments for my disability needs, and this limits my ability as well as my kids’ ability to integrate into the community at all.”
“It is not our problem. It is your community’s problem.”
“You keep expecting us to behave like people who don’t have a disability—and we can’t.”
“I think someone needs to call the mental health practice and help them understand that I can’t explain everything verbally, since they couldn’t understand when I told them, apparently.”

🧠 TRANSLATED FOR THE VERBALLY DEPENDENT, ACCESS-ILLITERATE PROFESSIONALS:

I requested therapy with adjustments.
You offered verbal performance instead.
I disclosed my communication needs.
You pathologised my precision.
I named exclusion.
You escalated it.

🗣 ACCESS STATEMENT—STILL UNREAD, STILL UNMET:

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

You offer assessments with no access.
You offer support with no structure.
And then you call us “noncompliant.”

📎 CLOSING NOTE FOR FUTURE TRIBUNALS:

This isn’t therapy avoidance.
It’s documentation of access denial masquerading as care.
Your system resents the quiet.
Mine will publish it.

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy


No comments:

No, It’s Not My Problem. It’s Yours.


🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024

I’D LOVE TO GO TO THERAPY—IF ANY OF YOU UNDERSTOOD ACCESS.

Also titled: “The Community Doesn’t Include Us Because It Wasn’t Designed To.”

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic, Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Filed Under: Therapy Refusal · Disability Adjustment Failure · Mental Health Access Denied · Community Barriers · Verbal Communication Misconduct · SWANK Institutional Access Register

🪞 WHAT I SAID (CLEARLY—AND IN WRITING):

“I’d love to go to therapy but no one will provide adjustments for my disability needs, and this limits my ability as well as my kids’ ability to integrate into the community at all.”
“It is not our problem. It is your community’s problem.”
“You keep expecting us to behave like people who don’t have a disability—and we can’t.”
“I think someone needs to call the mental health practice and help them understand that I can’t explain everything verbally, since they couldn’t understand when I told them, apparently.”

🧠 WHAT THAT ACTUALLY MEANS (FOR THE ACCESS-ILLITERATE):

I’m not “resisting support.”
I’m excluded from it—on architectural, not emotional, grounds.

Access isn’t an attitude problem.
It’s a planning failure.
Your services were not built for people like me.
So don’t perform shock when I walk past your inaccessibility and say: no, thank you.

📎 ACCESS STATEMENT (INCLUDED. IGNORED. ARCHIVED.):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

You require verbalism like it’s a sacred rite.
I offer clarity in writing.
You respond with silence—or blame.

📣 CLOSING REMARK FOR THE LEGALLY AND SOCIALLY UNTRAINED:

You do not get to bar entry and label us disengaged.
You do not get to erase exclusion by reframing it as refusal.
You do not get to design failure and pin it on the disabled.

This is not a therapy gap.
It’s a compliance gap.

—

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy


No comments:

Refusing Adjustments Isn’t a Mystery—It’s Abuse.


🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024

YOU’VE IGNORED ME FOR A YEAR. SO DON’T PRETEND TO BE CONFUSED.

Also titled: “The Twelve-Month Breathless Farce.”

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic, Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Filed Under: NHS Litigation Docket · Respiratory Neglect · Disability Adjustment Breach · A&E Hostility · Written-Only Mandate · Public Body Stonewalling · SWANK Exhaustion Index

🫁 THREE STATEMENTS THAT OUGHT TO HAVE BEEN SUFFICIENT—EVEN FOR YOU:

“Your hospitals refuse to treat us when we go to A&E due to ignorance about asthma.”
“You all refuse to provide adjustments when we are compromised verbally.”
“No one will give me the hospital’s perspective and I’ve been asking for this for an entire year.”

Twelve months of legally sound, clinically grounded written notice.
In return: silence, avoidance, and ritualised incapacity.

🧠 TRANSLATION (FOR THE PROFESSIONALS WHO REQUIRE REPEATED INSTRUCTION):

I am asthmatic.
My children are asthmatic.
We attend A&E.
You withhold treatment.
I invoke disability law.
You demand verbal performance.
I explain.
You loop.
I cite.
You erase.

This is not safeguarding.
This is slow-motion sabotage in bureaucratic costume.

🗣 ACCESS STATEMENT (LEGALLY DECLARED, SOCIALLY DISMISSED):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

You turned a lawful accommodation into a compliance test.
You failed.

📎 CLOSING ENTRY IN THE BREATHLESS LEDGER:

You withheld care.
You refused access.
You looped me for a calendar year.
You rebranded medical trauma as procedural confusion.

I do not owe you another syllable.
You owe me twelve months of rectification—and a permanent entry in the archive.

—

Polly Chromatic
Director, SWANK London Ltd.
Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swanklondon.com
✉ director@swanklondon.com
⚠ Written Communication Only – View Policy


No comments:

I’m Efficient. You’re Defensive.


🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024
IF YOU CAN’T TAKE EMAILS, YOU SHOULDN’T HAVE A JOB.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic
Filed Under: Rejection of Access · Email Suppression · Institutional Weakness · Police Intolerance · Psychologist Avoidance · Writing as Breathing · Telepathic Preference

✉️ THE EMAIL THAT WAS “TOO MUCH” FOR PROFESSIONALS:

“I’m having a hard time reading written communication from anyone because I’m met with rejection so often and it’s traumatising and heartbreaking for me.”
“Such as the mental health centre and psychologist and police responding by telling me to stop emailing them when I’m trying to explain my perspective in the best way I can without compromising my ability to talk and breathe.”
“I can’t explain all of this verbally repeatedly and I can’t email each person and explain it repeatedly either because I have four kids to homeschool and care for and I have to also work.”
“I have to be as efficient as possible.”

This is not a tantrum.
It is a compressed survival dispatch.

🧠 INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSES, TRANSLATED:

🙉 “Please stop emailing us.”
🙈 “We’re too overwhelmed to read.”
🙊 “Just talk to us—never mind your lungs.”

🧬 ACCESS STATEMENT (WHICH YOU CONTINUE TO VIOLATE):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

If email causes you stress,
you should not be in public service.
Because disability access is not a lifestyle request—
it is a legal right.

📝 FINAL NOTE FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF Inbox Fragility:

I write to preserve breath.
You recoil from formatting.
I email to streamline survival.
You call it excessive.

If you cannot cope with correspondence,
step away from other people’s lives.

Polly Chromatic
Reading, writing, resisting. Efficient despite you.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com


No comments:

The Abuse Cycle You Call ‘Procedure.’

 🖋 SWANK Dispatch | 24 November 2024

STOP FORCING ME TO EXPLAIN VERBALLY. YOU’RE CAUSING THE ILLNESS.

Filed From: Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
Author: Polly Chromatic

Filed Under: Verbal Demand Abuse, Asthma Mismanagement, Institutional Repetition, NHS Neglect, Medical Adjustment Refusal, Cycle of Collapse, Disabled Family Defence

To: Kirsty Hornal
Cc: Laura Savage, Simon O'Meara, Dr Philip Reid, Gideon Mpalanyi, Harley Street Mental Health
Bcc: Nannette Nicholson, Archivist of the Repeating Collapse

🌀 THE ABUSE CYCLE THEY ALL PARTICIPATE IN:

“Everyone tries to force me to explain things verbally repeatedly, which exacerbates my asthma. And they also get angry if I try to communicate via email.”
“Does anyone want my perspective?”
“When I get sick—or my kids get sick—the hospital is so ignorant about asthma that they refuse us treatment.”
“And the cycle continues.”

🧠 PROPOSED SOLUTIONS (WHICH WILL BE IGNORED):

  1. A disability advocate for my family.

  2. A letter from our GP to carry to A&E every time.

  3. Hospitals provide adjustments so I don’t have to speak verbally at all.

This is not complicated.
But bureaucrats need confusion to justify inaction.

📎 ACCESS STATEMENT (UNHEARD YET AGAIN):

“I suffer from a disability which makes speaking verbally difficult. I prefer to communicate telepathically to minimise respiratory strain; however, email is fine.”

Yet instead of assistance,
I receive verbal demand, disbelief, and delay.

🔁 LET ME MAKE THIS CLEAR ONE FINAL TIME:

You're not helping.
You're triggering collapse.
You're not confused.
You're refusing to change.

Polly Chromatic
Refusing to repeat myself for your comfort.
📍 Flat 22, 2 Periwinkle Gardens, London W2
🌐 www.swankarchive.com

Labels: Kirsty Hornal, Laura Savage, Simon O’Meara, Dr Philip Reid, Gideon Mpalanyi, Harley Street, asthma discrimination, verbal demand abuse, GP letter workaround, A&E adjustment failure, NHS negligence, email clarity rejected, medical discrimination, SWANK testimony dispatch

No comments: